- Published Articles
- In the Press
- Press Releases
Sign Up for Alerts
Sign up to receive receive industry-specific emails from our legal team.
Sign Up for Alerts
We provide tailored, industry-specific legal updates to our clients and other friends of the firm.
Areas of Interest
February 20th, 2014
Hold off on that Congratulatory Ad
The Olympics and the Academy Awards always inspire advertisers to run ads congratulating winners. But not so fast.
Michael Jordan's lawsuit over a congratulatory advertisement placed by Jewel-Osco Supermarkets in a Sports Illustrated special edition celebrating his induction into the Basketball Hall of Fame was just reinstated on appeal. The advertisement is grounds for Michael Jordan to sue Jewel-Osco on right of publicity and false association claims.
The decision of the Federal District Court in Chicago that the advertisement was not commercial speech because it did not mention a product or service was reversed on appeal. The Appellate Court held that the test should be "whether (1) the speech is an advertisement; (2) the speech refers to a specific product; and (3) the speaker has an economic motivation for the speech." However, no one factor is sufficient, and the absence of any mention of a product or service was not sufficient to rule out a claim.
The benefit of the brand awareness or loyalty and "enhancing the Jewel-Osco brand in the minds of consumers" makes an ad congratulating a famous athlete a "promotional device for the advertiser." Michael Jordan may pursue his claims to compensation for the benefit the advertiser derives from congratulating him and may also seek to prove that the advertisement "caused a likelihood of confusion that Jordan was a Jewel-Osco sponsor or endorsed its products and services."
Since no one wants to go before a jury fighting a beloved celebrity, the cause will in all likelihood settle for an undisclosed sum. We will let you know if there is a different outcome.
If you have any questions about the appeal, or about any other right of publicity issue, please contact Rick Kurnit at (212) 826 5531 or firstname.lastname@example.org, or any other member of the Frankfurt Kurnit Advertising, Marketing and Public Relations Group.
Other Advertising Law Alerts
What the Advertising Industry Can Learn from Kim Kardashian’s Settlement with the SEC
On October 3, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that it entered into a $1.26 million settlement with Kim Kardashian over her social media promotion of the EMAX token without disclosing payment she received from token issuer, EthereumMax. The matter provides important lessons for advertisers. Read more.
October 10 2022
Get Ready for California’s New “Automatic Renewal” Rules
California recently amended its Automatic Purchase Renewals law. The amended statute - effective July 1st -- require marketers to provide consumers of automatic renewal or continuous service offers with more information and easier ways to terminate. Read more.
June 22 2018
“Made in the U.S.A.” Claims Continue to be Scrutinized
In 2016, California amended Section 17533.7 of the California Business and Professions Code ("Section 17533"), liberalizing the standard for selling products labeled "Made in U.S.A" to California consumers. Read more.
June 4 2018